Vermont Yankee to Diablo Canyon: How Nuclear Liability Suits Actually Get Won
A survey of forty years of nuclear tort litigation shows plaintiffs rarely win on the science — they win on the paper trail.
What happens next is decided by regulation, not physics. The Compliance Gap tracks the point where technical failure becomes legal exposure — written for engineers who end up in depositions, and lawyers who need to understand the control room before they can cross-examine it.
Where technical complexity meets legal consequence.
The most recent dispatches, across every category we cover.
A survey of forty years of nuclear tort litigation shows plaintiffs rarely win on the science — they win on the paper trail.
The provision that lets licensees make changes without prior NRC approval is also the one that generates the most enforcement disputes.
A minute-by-minute reconstruction of temperature data against the launch-decision record, and where the two diverge.
Where ITAR and EAR jurisdiction actually overlaps with subcontractor deliverables — and where most compliance programs assume coverage they don't have.
A small desk of contributors working across engineering and law, building each piece from the primary record — filings, inspection reports, and code — rather than press summaries.
Meet the desk →We're looking for people fluent in both failure modes and case law — contributors who can read a fault tree and a consent decree with equal precision.
View open roles →One dispatch when the record changes — no digest, no filler.